Sources of truth. How can user insights drive product strategy?
Shifting a culture from reactive to strategic partners.
Product teams face constant pressure from executives, customers, and shifting market forces. With so many competing voices, it’s easy to lose focus or chase the wrong priorities. Without a clear and trusted source of truth, teams risk wasting valuable time and resources on initiatives that don’t move the business forward. (see previous article)
Below are some example situations that may be creating a reactive product strategy in your organization:
Lack of mature OKRs focused more on outputs versus solving & delivering on real customer challenges
Sales & pre-sales pressure from customers to add new features or customizations in order to close deals though it may not be a common market fit
Building snowflake customizations or configurations during product implementation causing bloated support overhead and missing the benefit for wider customer usage
Development leadership reluctance to modernize tech stack slowing time to market for desperately needed product improvements
CX team reports on recurring customer defects where there may be a bigger challenge that requires a root cause analysis or broader changes in strategy
Product teams misinterpreting context of customer business requirements
Generic customer feedback creating misunderstandings in focus areas
Lack of centralized common personas & journey mapping around the end-to-end solution creating misunderstandings and confusion between global teams
Many organizations claim to be “customer-first,” but living up to that promise requires more than ad-hoc feedback collection. Customers must have both a clear incentive and the right context to share meaningful insights they can justify investing their time and resources in.
For example, customers may express frustrations with service delivery, but they often lack visibility into the upstream processes that cause those issues. Without structured research to capture that broader context, product teams risk solving symptoms instead of root causes.
Begin to ask internal stakeholders:
In the analysis, evaluate the following:
Executives, sales teams, and customer-facing groups often compete to influence product direction. While each perspective has value, the loudest voice can dominate decision-making, leaving strategy vulnerable to bias.
A disciplined customer research program helps to level the playing field by grounding conversations in evidence, not opinions. When user research is consistently shared across the organization, teams can align around customer needs rather than internal politics.
When everything is a priority, nothing is a priority & quality suffers. It's critical to have the right tools to create focus areas that build confidence, reduce risk & deliver impact.
Below are some example distractors:
The loudest leader may not have the full understanding of the lifecycle, challenges, and sihifts in behavior. A recent real world example encountered was a senior leader pushed for a reporting dashboard on the solution suite to help sell new regional customers, but when validating with customer decision makers in several forums over 3 months, they collectively saw very little value in it since they already had spent time/money on 3rd party software & teams to capture the full picture of their business. What they really needed was a universal aggregated solution that monitored insights. They needed a platform ecosystem solution, not a product level solution.
The biggest and loudest customers may not have the products long term interest in mind. A recent example comes to mind with a big EU bank. They had a proprietary requirement that didn't meet the needs of the rest of the NA and EU market & was based on an operating structure from the past 30+ years. The team had to decide if this would be worth supporting in a configuration, could benefit other customers or could we advise the customer on operational improvements? Every customer validation in the market provided insights that this was a unique requirement & would not be worth the investment to support and manage long term.
There is a balance between exciting new features to keep customers & close deals and the need to drive forward critical product experience improvements. When focus is only on quickly adding features guided by technical convenience, that "bolt on" or "stitched together" effect quickly becomes prevalent to users and creates UX and Tech debt over time.
Below: Lifecycle Journey map illustrating orchestration of personas and prioritization of of critical points & opportunities
Opportunity examples:
Who is impacted the most frequently?
Where in the journey is the lowest customer sentiment conveyed with product users?
Where is there excessive manual entry?
Where are business processes failing for customers that need to be reevaluated?
Where is there confusion on instruction and messaging that could be improved?
Is the team witnessing an uptick in requests for key enhancements to meeting market need?
Is there a product gap in a region that is creating hesitation or slowing growth?
Is there a new emerging business opportunity identified that could be a key differentiator?
People are & will continue to be at the very center of product and service experiences. Start with those people who use the experiences everyday. Clarity, direction & purpose will come naturally. Those common insights are catalysts that will help create a future vision and guide product strategy that meets customer expectations for years to come.
If you’d like to explore how user insights can help your organization strengthen strategy and accelerate outcomes, let’s connect.